ANDREW OF AMERICA on To Cut or Not to Cut
(C) 1994, 1996

ANDREW OF AMERICA here,
on "To cut, or not to cut?"

That is the incision
That is *your* decision
and hence, the indecision!

The question has been posed from a netter in Canada
which is better: cut or uncut?

Believing that he is not talking about crystal
(but is speaking of stemware nonetheless)
friends who have had it done as adults tell
me: "Don't do it!  You lose a great deal of sensitivity
and sensation (not to mention your foreskin, bubbulah!)

Another who had difficulty urinating and with personal
hygiene said it was a blessing.  He also said he had
difficulty enjoying masturbation and could never come
that way prior to circumcision.  Apparently, his hot rod
was not a "convertible" (that means he couldn't take the
top down boopie!)

A friend has his done like a Floyd the Barber haircut: just
a little off the top, please.  He says this top job offers
him the hygienicconvenience of full circumcision without the
loss of personal lubricant.  This halfsies compromise also
attracts would be sexual partners who are sitting on the
fence on the foreskin issue (when they could be sitting on
something else!)

A Rabbi once said that chopping the tops of phalli was intended
to reduce sexual pleasure, and hence, temptation.

Silly Rabbi, Dicks are for Tricks!
ANDREW OF AMERICA
I only look Jewish.
------------------------------
(C) 1994, 1996 ANDREW OF AMERICA.  ALL RIGHTS RESERVED